Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Solar Energy Industries Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Florida Solar Energy Industries Association

Florida Solar Energy Industries Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability (all sources are the organisation itself or its parent organisation). Also created by an SPA who removed the prod from the article. Number 57 12:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Local industry advocacy group. I see side mentions here and there, but no substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources, offered or to be found. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 07:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails GNG; local and trivial in nature. Kierzek (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
• Delete -- $60K a year is not much of an association. Rhadow (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.