Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whittier Street Health Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy re-nomination. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Whittier Street Health Center

Whittier Street Health Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article dealing mainly with general public health problems in the region, and a list of non-specificservices . The references are best seen as similar PR to this article. DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

• Keep - Although a lot of promotional material needs to be cut from the article, the center has received significant coverage in reliable sources, including the following. – --Hirolovesswords (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Kong, Dolores. "City-BRA fight hurts Roxbury medical center". The Boston Globe. February 10, 1992.

Salsberg, Bob. "New inner-city health center opens in Boston". The Boston Globe. February 4, 2012.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.